Report Inappropriate Comments

If there is in fact some kind of new planned development adjacent to the landfill, it should have been stated in the GZA report, in my opinion. That could affect the parameters of their study and any remedial recommendations.

If you look at an aerial photo from 1972 (link below) we see a narrow band of trees separating the landfill from what looks like another dumping ground, which is now the city’s DPW yard-waste collection area. One could easily wonder if waste intended for one area wound up in the other. Fifty years ago, who was keeping track? I haven’t seen the report, but GZA should have checked both areas.

https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?layers=ba6eff86f5784923b9e3ae519e826b6e

From: Report on closed landfill questioned by residents

Please explain the inappropriate content below.